EQV Framework · Day 90 Review

Next 90-Day
Architecture

Designed before Day 90 review concludes Pulls from 5 instruments Produces Cycle 2 commitments

The 30-60-90 architecture has a defined endpoint but the practices it establishes do not. This template pulls the handoff data from five Cycle 1 instruments — the Pre-Flight, Translation Map, Values Filter, Authenticity Indicators, and Cultural Ritual — and assembles them into the specific, targeted commitments that Cycle 2 requires.

The design principle

Authentic leadership development is a navigational practice, not a project with a completion date. The next architecture is not designed after the Day 90 review — it is designed before the Day 90 review concludes, so the leader leaves with commitments in hand, not intentions in mind.

Section 1: Cycle 1 context and Pre-Flight score comparison.
Section 2: Translation Map handoff — which behaviors carry forward, escalate, or enter culture codification.
Section 3: Values Filter — which aspirational values are now ready for Cycle 2 entry.
Section 4: Authenticity Indicators and Cultural Ritual sustainability review.
Section 5: Phase design — specific commitments for each of the three phases.
Section 6: Accountability architecture and output.

Data & privacy

Nothing is stored or transmitted. All data lives in this browser session only. Copy your output before closing.

1

Cycle 1 review & Pre-Flight

Leader name

Organization

Cycle 1 start date

Day 90 review date

Facilitator / coach

Pre-Flight comparison

Enter both scores. The delta drives the framing of Cycle 2 — improvement, plateau, or regression each produce a different next architecture.

Cycle 1 — Day 1

—

Baseline score

→

Cycle 1 — Day 90

—

End-of-cycle score

Trap cluster movement

Enter the Cycle 1 Day 1 and Day 90 scores for each trap cluster (0–100, where higher = healthier). This determines which clusters need Phase 2 focus in Cycle 2.

Cycle 1 overall reflection — what the 90 days revealed

2

Translation Map handoff

Source: Translation Map

Review the frequency ratings from Cycle 1. Behaviors rated 4–5 are candidates for Culture Codification. Behaviors rated 1–2 on the leader's most important value are the primary Cycle 2 focus. Behaviors rated 3 need a new structural support in Phase 2.

Tap the dots to set each behavior's Cycle 1 frequency (1–5). The action label updates automatically.

Key pattern from the Translation Map frequency data

3

Values Filter — Cycle 2 readiness

Source: Values Filter

Values that were scored Aspirational in Cycle 1 may now be ready to enter Cycle 2 as genuine values — if the leader has accumulated behavioral evidence during the 90 days. Apply the Three-Question Test again before confirming entry.

New values to consider for Cycle 2 (not previously in the Filter)

4

Indicators & Ritual carry-forward

Authenticity Indicators

Source: Authenticity Indicators

Review each Cycle 1 indicator. Those scored 4–5 (Usually / Consistently) carry forward or escalate to organizational standard. Those scored 1–2 need redesign before they enter Cycle 2.

Overall Authenticity Score (Cycle 1)

Sustainability band

Which indicators carry into Cycle 2 unchanged?

Which indicators need redesign for Cycle 2?

New indicators to add in Cycle 2 (drawn from Cycle 2 Translation Map behaviors)

Cultural Ritual

Source: Cultural Ritual Guide

Ritual run rate (Cycle 1)

Genuine quality rate

Ritual sustainability band

Ritual decision for Cycle 2

5

Cycle 2 phase design

Define the specific commitments for each of the three phases. Carry the sequence: awareness before action · structures before culture · accountability from Day 1. Every commitment must name the behavior, the context, and the observable indicator of success.

Phase 1 · Days 1–30

Awareness — micro-commitments

Primary observation focus

Day 14 milestone — Compass revision priority

Accountability partner

Phase 2 · Days 31–60

Structure — meso-commitments

New or revised structural change

Psychological safety baseline — what to watch for

Phase 3 · Days 61–90

Culture — macro-commitments

Authenticity Indicators — Cycle 2 framework update

Culture codification candidates

Ritual and decision-process commitments

6

Accountability & output

Define the accountability structure for Cycle 2 before the Day 90 review ends. The accountability architecture is a precondition of the commitments being made, not an add-on after they are made.

Day 30 review

Day 60 review

Day 90 review

Written behavioral log

The single most important commitment in Cycle 2

Cycle 2 architecture complete